Mishnah Bava Kamma, chapter 6

Outlines, charts and summary

Mishnah 1: A flock that gets out of the pen

An owner who shut his flock in properly is exempt if it still gets out. If he did not, he is liable. If the pen was broken at night or by bandits, he is not liable.

Closing it in

  • If he shut the flock in properly and it went out and caused damage: exempt. If not properly: liable.

Broken through

  • If the pen was broken through at night, or bandits broke it, and the flock came out and caused damage: he is not liable. If the bandits brought out the flock, the bandits are liable.
  • This begins the laws of the crop-destroying beast, the third archetypal cause of damage.

Kehati's notes

  • "Properly" means a door able to stand up to ordinary wind; that is enough for tooth and foot, which are attested dangers from the start.
  • The exemption for a break at night is for a break he could not have prevented; if the break was by day and enough time passed for him to find out and guard, he is liable.
  • If the bandits stood in front of the flock until it went out, it is as if they took it out by hand. If they only broke the pen, the damage is indirect (grama), and they are exempt.

A flock gets out

What happenedThe owner
Shut in properly and it went out and damagedexempt
Not shut in properlyliable
The pen broke at night, or bandits broke itnot liable
Bandits brought out the flockthe bandits are liable
הכונס צאן לדיר ונעל בפניה כראוי ויצאה והזיקה פטור. לא נעל בפניה כראוי ויצאה והזיקה חייב. נפרצה בלילה או שפרצוה לסטים ויצאה והזיקה פטור. הוציאוה לסטים. לסטים חייבים:
If a man brought his flock into a pen and shut it in properly and it went out and caused damage, he is exempt. If he had not shut it in properly and it went out and caused damage, he is liable. If the pen was broken through at night, or bandits broke through it, and the flock came out and caused damage, he is not liable. If the bandits brought out the flock, the bandits are liable.  Section one teaches that if a person were to properly enclose his flock and nevertheless the flock were to escape, the person is exempt. Since he fulfilled his responsibility he is not liable for damages. However, if he didn’t enclose the flock properly he will be liable.  Section two can be explained as an exception to the rule in section one that if he didn’t enclose the flock properly he is liable. Section two teaches that if the flock broke out at night (i.e. they broke the enclosed part of the fence) or bandits broke the fence, the owner is exempt, even though he did not properly lock the fence. The owner is not liable since the animals broke out against his control, even though they could have gone out through the main gate, thereby making him liable. If, on the other hand, they were to have broken the fence during the day, and he didn’t lock it properly, he is liable. (There are other explanations to this section). The final clause of the mishnah says that if the bandits physically let out the flock, they are liable if it causes damage.

Mishnah 2: The flock in the sun, and in a garden

An owner is liable if he left the flock in the sun or gave it to someone who cannot be responsible. A flock that fell into a garden pays only what it benefited; one that entered normally pays for the damage.

Left in the sun, or handed over

  • If he left the flock in the sun, or delivered it to a deaf-mute, an idiot or a minor, and it came out and caused damage, he is liable. If he delivered it to a shepherd, the shepherd takes the place of the owner.
  • In the heat the animals go wild and break out, which he should have expected.

In a garden

  • If the flock fell into a garden and benefited, he pays for the benefit. If it went down in its usual way and caused damage, he pays for the damage.
  • Falling in is an unavoidable accident.

How the damage is assessed

  • They assess what a seah's space of ground in that field was worth before and after.
  • Rabbi Shimon: if they ate fully grown produce, he repays in fully grown produce; one seah, one seah; two, two.

Kehati's notes

  • The mishnah's shepherd who "takes the place of the owner" is a shepherd who handed the flock to a second shepherd under him; the second takes his place. An owner handing a flock to a guard is in 4:9.
  • A seah's space is a field in which one sows a seah, 2,500 square cubits.

Halakha

  • The halakha follows Rabbi Shimon.

The flock and the owner

What happenedThe owner pays
Left in the sun, or given to a deaf-mute, idiot or minorliable
Fell into a garden and benefitedwhat it benefited
Went down into the garden in its usual waythe damage
הניחה בחמה או שמסרה לחרש שוטה וקטן. ויצאה והזיקה חייב. מסרה לרועה נכנס רועה תחתיו. נפלה לגינה ונהנית משלמת מה שנהנית ירדה כדרכה והזיקה משלמת מה שהזיקה. כיצד משלמת מה שהזיקה. שמין בית סאה באותה שדה כמה היתה יפה וכמה היא יפה. רבי שמעון אומר אכלה פירות גמורים משלמת פירות גמורים אם סאה סאה. אם סאתים סאתים:
If he left the flock in the sun, or he delivered it to the care of a deaf-mute, an idiot or a minor, and it came out and caused damage, he is liable. If he delivered it to a shepherd, the shepherd takes the place of the owner. If the flock fell into a garden and derived any benefit, he pays for the benefit. If the flock went down [into the garden] in its usual way and caused damage, he must pay for the damage it caused. How does he pay for the damage it caused? They assess what a seah’s space of ground in that field was worth before and what it is worth now. Rabbi Shimon says: “If they consumed fully grown produce he must repay with fully grown produce; if they destroyed on seah he must repay one seah, if two seah, two seahs.

Mishnah 3: Sheaves stacked in a field

The same rules as in 5:3, applied to a stack in another's field: without permission the field owner is not liable; with permission he is liable, if he accepted to guard.

The cases

  • If a man stacked his sheaves in his fellow's field without permission and the field owner's beast ate them: exempt. If the beast was injured by them: the owner of the stack is liable. If he made the stack with permission: the owner of the field is liable.
  • These laws were learned in 5:3.

Kehati's notes

  • "The owner of the field is liable" means a guard of the threshing floors there, or a field owner who accepted to guard them. Rabbi (5:3) holds that letting someone in does not make him liable unless he accepted.
המגדיש בתוך שדה של חבירו שלא ברשות ואכלתן בהמתו של בעל השדה פטור. ואם הוזקה בהן. בעל הגדיש חייב. ואם הגדיש ברשות בעל השדה חייב:
If a man stacked his sheaves in his fellow’s field without his permission, and the owner of the field’s beast ate the sheaves, he is exempt. If [the beast] was injured by them, the owner of the stack is liable. If he made the stack with his permission, the owner of the field is liable.

Mishnah 4: Fire

The one who kindles a fire pays for everything it burns. The sages dispute how far the fire must spread. The halakha follows Rabbi Shimon: by the nature of the fire.

Sending fire

  • If a person sends fire in the hands of a deaf-mute, an idiot or a minor, he is not liable by the laws of man but is by the laws of Heaven. If he sent it in the hands of a person of sound senses, that person is liable.
  • Kehati: a deaf-mute, idiot or minor cannot be agents. An adult agent is liable, and the sender is exempt even from heavenly law, since there is no agent for a wrong act.

Several people

  • One brought the fire and another the wood: the one who brought the wood is liable. One brought the wood and another the fire: the one who brought the fire. Another fanned the flames: he is liable.
  • The last to contribute is liable for all the damage.
  • If the wind fanned the flame, they are all exempt.
  • This is only for an unusual wind. If it was an ordinary wind, the last is liable, since fire spreads in an ordinary wind and he should have guarded.

What it burns

  • If it consumed wood, stones or dust: he is liable, for it says "stacked corn, standing corn, or the field" (Exodus 22:5).

How far

  • If it passed over a fence four cubits high, or over a public way, or over a river: exempt.
  • A fire kindled in his own domain: Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah: as if in the middle of a kor's space; Rabbi Eliezer: sixteen cubits, like a public road; Rabbi Akiva: fifty cubits; Rabbi Shimon: all by the nature of the fire.

Halakha

  • The halakha follows Rabbi Shimon: if the fire is large, he is liable even beyond those distances.
How far can the fire spread and he still pays?Kindled in his own domain. A fence four cubits high, apublic way or a river: exempt.Rabbi Eliezer16 cubits, like a public roadRabbi Akiva50 cubitsRabbi Eleazar ben Azariahas if in the middle of akor's spaceRabbi Shimonall by the nature of thefireThe halakha follows Rabbi Shimon: the larger the fire,the farther he is liable.
השולח את הבערה ביד חרש. שוטה וקטן. פטור בדיני אדם וחייב בדיני שמים. שלח ביד פקח הפקח חייב. אחד הביא את האור ואחד הביא את העצים. המביא את העצים חייב. אחד הביא את העצים ואחד הביא את האור. המביא את האור חייב. בא אחר וליבה המלבה חייב. ליבתה הרוח כולן פטורין. השולח את הבערה ואכלה עצים. או אבנים. או עפר. חייב. שנאמר (שמות כב, ה) כי תצא אש ומצאה קוצים ונאכל גדיש או הקמה או השדה שלם ישלם המבעיר את הבערה. עברה גדר שהוא גבוה ארבע אמות. או דרך הרבים או נהר פטור. המדליק בתוך שלו עד כמה תעבור הדליקה. רבי אלעזר בן עזריה אומר רואין אותו כאילו הוא באמצע בית כור. רבי אליעזר אומר ששה עשר אמות כדרך רשות הרבים. רבי עקיבא אומר חמשים אמה. רבי שמעון אומר (שמות כב, ה) שלם ישלם המבעיר את הבערה הכל לפי הדליקה:
If a person sends forth fire in the hands of a deaf-mute, an idiot or a minor he is not liable by the laws of man, but he is liable by the laws of Heaven. If he sent it forth in the hands of a person of sound senses, the one of sound senses is liable. If one brought the fire, and then another brought the wood, he that brought the wood is liable. If one brought the wood and then another brought fire, he that brought the fire is liable. If another came and fanned the flames, the one who fanned the flame is liable. If the wind fanned the flame, they are all exempt. If a man sent forth fire, and it consumed wood or stones or dust, he is liable, for it says: “When a fire breaks out and spreads to thorns so that the stacked corn is consumed, or the standing corn, or the field, he that kindled the fire shall surely make restitution.” If it passed over a fence four cubits high, or over a public way, or over a river, he is exempt. If a man kindled fire within his own domain, how far may it spread [and he will still be liable]? Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah says: “It is looked at as if it was in the middle of a kor’s space.” [ Rabbi Eliezer says: “Sixteen cubits [in every direction] like a public highway.” Rabbi Akiva says: “Fifty cubits.” Rabbi Shimon says: “[It is said] ‘He that kindled the fire shall surely make restitution’, all is in accordance with the nature of the fire.”

Mishnah 5: What was in the stack

A fire that burns a stack with utensils in it: Rabbi Judah says pay for all; the Sages, only for the grain. In a large building all agree he pays for everything in it.

Utensils in the stack

  • If a man set fire to a stack and utensils in it caught fire: Rabbi Judah says he pays for what was in it; the Sages say only for a stack of wheat or barley.
  • The Sages agree with Rabbi Judah that if he burned a large building, he pays for everything in it, since it is the custom to leave goods in houses.
  • The Sages think it is not customary to leave things in stacks.

A kid and a slave

  • If a kid was fastened to the stack and a slave stood near by and they were burnt: he is liable. If a slave was fastened to it and a kid stood near by and they were burnt: he is not liable.

What was in the burned stack

What burnedRabbi JudahThe Sages
Utensils inside a stackpays for them toopays only for the wheat or barley
A large building with goods in itpays for everythingpays for everything (all agree)
A kid fastened to the stack, a slave nearby; both burnedliableliable
A slave fastened to the stack, a kid nearby; both burnednot liablenot liable
המדליק את הגדיש והיו בו כלים ודלקו רבי יהודה אומר ישלם מה שבתוכו. וחכמים אומרים אינו משלם אלא גדיש של חטין. או של שעורים. היה גדי כפות לו ועבד סמוך לו ונשרף עמו חייב. עבד כפות לו וגדי סמוך לו ונשרף עמו פטור. ומודים חכמים לרבי יהודה במדליק את הבירה שהוא משלם כל מה שבתוכו. שכן דרך בני אדם להניח בבתים:
If a man set fire to a stack and in it there were utensils and these caught fire: Rabbi Judah says: “He must make restitution for what was therein.” But the Sages say: “He need only pay for a stack of wheat or barley.” If a kid was fastened to it [to the stack] and a slave stood near by, and they were burnt with it, he is liable. If there was a slave fastened to it [to the stack] and a kid stood near by and they were burnt with it, he is not liable. The Sages agree with Rabbi Judah that if a man set fire to a large building, he must make restitution for everything therein; for such is the custom among men to leave [their goods] in their houses.

Mishnah 6: Sparks, flax and the lamp

A spark from a hammer: liable. A camel's flax that catches a shopkeeper's light: the camel's owner pays; if the lamp was outside the shop, the shopkeeper does. Rabbi Judah: not for a Hanukkah light.

The spark

  • If a spark flew out from under the hammer and caused damage, he is liable.
  • Kehati: it is like one who throws a stone or an arrow.

The camel and the shop

  • A camel laden with flax passed in the public domain and its flax entered a shop and caught fire from the shopkeeper's light: the owner of the camel is liable.
  • But if the shopkeeper left his light outside, the shopkeeper is liable.

Rabbi Judah

  • If it was a Hanukkah light, the shopkeeper is not liable.
  • The Hanukkah light is supposed to be placed outside, at the door.
  • The halakha does not follow Rabbi Judah.

Sparks and lamps

What happenedWho pays
A spark flew from under the hammerthe one who struck
A camel's flax went into a shop and caught the shopkeeper's lightthe owner of the camel
The shopkeeper had left his light outsidethe shopkeeper
A Hanukkah light (Rabbi Judah)not liable; the halakha does not follow him
גץ שיצא מתחת הפטיש והזיק חייב. גמל שהיה טעון פשתן ועבר ברשות הרבים. ונכנס פשתנו לתוך החנות. ודלקו בנרו של חנוני והדליק את הבירה. בעל הגמל חייב. הניח חנוני נרו מבחוץ החנוני חייב. רבי יהודה אומר בנר חנוכה פטור:
If a spark flew out from under the hammer and caused damage, he is liable. If a camel laden with flax passed by in the public domain and its load of flax entered into a shop and caught fire, the owner of the camel is liable. But if the shopkeeper left his light outside, the shopkeeper is liable. Rabbi Judah says: “If it was a Hannukah light, he is not liable.”

Chapter summary

Draft from the mishnah, R. Kulp and Kehati.

Key principles

  1. An owner who guarded his flock properly is exempt if it escapes through no fault; one who did not is liable. 6:16:2
  2. A flock that falls into a garden pays what it benefited; one that enters normally pays the damage, assessed by the value of a seah's space. 6:2
  3. Whoever kindles a fire pays for everything it burns. When several contribute, the last one is liable; a wind frees all only if it was unusual. 6:4
  4. The distance a fire must travel to be exempt is disputed; the halakha follows Rabbi Shimon, by the nature of the fire. 6:4
  5. The Sages: goods are paid for only where it is customary to keep them (a building, not a stack of hay); Rabbi Judah: he pays for all that was in it. 6:5

Key terms

fire (esh) אש 6:4
The fourth archetypal cause of damage: the one who kindles a fire pays for the damage it does.
indirect cause (grama) גרמא 6:1
Damage caused indirectly, such as bandits who break a pen and the flock then leaves. Not liable in human law.
laws of man and of Heaven דיני אדם ודיני שמים 6:4
A wrong that cannot be prosecuted in court but for which the person is still accountable.

Key debates

How far must the fire spread? 6:4

View 1

Rabbi Eleazar ben Azariah: like the middle of a kor's space; Rabbi Eliezer: 16 cubits; Rabbi Akiva: 50.

View 2

Rabbi Shimon: all by the nature of the fire. The halakha follows Rabbi Shimon.

Utensils inside a stack that burned 6:5

View 1

Rabbi Judah: he pays for what was in it.

View 2

The Sages: only for the wheat or barley. In a large building all agree he pays for the contents.

The Hanukkah light outside the shop 6:6

View 1

The first view: the shopkeeper who left his light outside is liable.

View 2

Rabbi Judah: not liable for a Hanukkah light. The halakha does not follow him.